A site capture passes through several stages before it becomes useful to a reviewer. Recording the walk, processing the imagery, aligning the spatial output and making it available for review are related steps, but they are not interchangeable milestones.
The deployment context
Contineu's production records include Oberoi Realty's Elysian and Sky City projects. The reviewed activity includes Elysian captures in October 2026 and Sky City captures in September. Delivery discussions also document scan processing and alignment work.
This establishes active capture and delivery work at named projects.
Make the delivery stages visible
A successful upload confirms that data has reached the workflow. It does not confirm that the resulting view has been checked. Processing produces outputs; alignment connects them to the intended site context; delivery checks determine whether the reviewer can use them.
The Oberoi deployment records show why those distinctions matter. Some scan-only jobs had completed processing while other work still required alignment. Describing all of those jobs with one status would conceal what remained to be done.
Review location as well as appearance
A clear panorama is valuable, but the reviewer also needs confidence in the floor and area it represents. Spatial alignment should be checked against recognisable features and the intended plan. Where a correction is needed, the output should stay in the appropriate delivery state until that work is resolved.
A useful review handoff identifies the capture, its location and the outputs available. It should also make coverage limitations clear enough that a reviewer does not mistake an unseen area for an inspected one.
The lesson for another deployment
Set acceptance checks for the complete workflow. Confirm the capture identity, image usability, location and intended review output. Give each incomplete stage an owner rather than treating processing completion as the final outcome.
Oberoi Realty's deployment illustrates the operational steps between footage and a usable site record. A future outcome study can evaluate review time or issue resolution against a defined baseline. The present case focuses on the capture and delivery work supported by the project records.
